Association Between Anxiety And Labor PainIntensity During The First Stage Of Active Labor in Primigravidas
Abstract
Maternal anxiety during childbirth is widely recognized as a psychological factor that may intensify perceived
pain and affect labor progress; however, its specific association with pain levels in primigravidas during the first active stage of labor remains under-investigated, particularly in Indonesian clinical settings. This study aimed to examine the correlation between maternal anxiety and labor pain intensity among primigravida women in the active phase of first-stage labor. An analytical observational approach with a cross-sectional design was employed. A sample of 37 primigravidas was recruited using simple random sampling at RSUD Dr. Sayidiman Magetan. Anxiety levels were measured using the Pregnancy-Related Anxiety Questionnaire-Revised (PRAQ-R2), and labor pain intensity was assessed using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). Data were analyzed using the Spearman Rank correlation test with a significance threshold of p < 0.05. The findings showed that the majority of respondents experienced severe anxiety, and all reported severe labor pain. Statistical testing demonstrated a moderate positive correlation between maternal anxiety and pain intensity (rho = 0.48; p = 0.002), indicating that higher anxiety was associated with heightened pain perception. In conclusion, maternal anxiety is significantly associated with increased labor pain during the first active stage in primigravidas, suggesting that psychological distress may amplify physiological pain responses during childbirth. These results highlight the importance of integrating psychological assessment and supportive interventions such as antenatal counseling, breathing regulation, structured emotional support, and relaxation techniques into maternity care practices. Future research should incorporate larger and more diverse cohorts, additional psychosocial determinants, and interventional analyses to further elucidate causal mechanisms and improve labor management strategies.
Full text article
References
[1] L. Bist et al., “Childbirth preparedness and childbirth anxiety among primigravida women in a lower-middle-income country,” Women and Birth, 2025.
[2] J. Nahaee et al., “Association of childbirth experience with long-term maternal outcomes,” BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2024.
[3] M. Bagherinia et al., “Prevalence of negative birth experience: a systematic review,” BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2025.
[4] E. O. Bodunde et al., “Pregnancy and birth complications and long-term maternal mental health,” BJOG, 2025.
[5] D. He et al., “Prevalence and factors associated with fear of childbirth in women with late pregnancy,” Front. Public Health, 2025.
[6] Y. Huang et al., “A comparison of childbirth self-efficacy, fear of childbirth, and labor pain intensity in primiparas and multiparas,” BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2024.
[7] G. Nandhini and P. Mahalakshmi, “Maternal anxiety at term and its impact on childbirth: a cross-sectional study,” Healthcare Bulletin, 2024.
[8] M. J. E. Naibili et al., “Relationship between knowledge level and anxiety in pregnant women toward labor,” J. Ilmu Keperawatan, 2022.
[9] M. Nikpour et al., “Comparing fear of childbirth and labor pain intensity in multiparous and primiparous women,” J. Midwifery Reprod. Health, 2024.
[10] A. Kedir et al., “Mode of delivery preferences: the role of childbirth fear and related factors,” Front. Psychol., 2023.
[11] W. Nori et al., “Non-pharmacological pain management in labor: an updated review,” Cureus, vol. 15, 2023.
[12] W. T. Elgzar et al., “Non-pharmacological labor pain relief methods: a systematic review,” Reprod. Health, 2024.
[13] A. A. Mohammed and E. M. Abed, “Efficacy of non-pharmacological interventions for labor pain reduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” Afr. J. Reprod. Health, 2025.
[14] S. Barut et al., “Trends and hotspots of research on non-pharmacological interventions for labor pain: a bibliometric analysis,” J. Psychosom. Obstet. Gynaecol., 2024.
[15] L. Abikou et al., “Healthcare providers’ utilization of nonpharmacological pain management during labor,” J. Obstet. Gynecol. Neonatal Nurs., 2024.
[16] T. Xie et al., “Psychometric evaluation of the Pregnancy-Related Anxiety Questionnaire-Revised 2 in Chinese pregnant women,” Midwifery, 2022.
[17] R. Shirabe et al., “Responsiveness of the Japanese version of the Pregnancy-Related Anxiety Questionnaire–Revised 2,” J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res., 2025.
[18] W. Kurniawati et al., “Validation of the pregnancy-related anxiety scale for pregnant women in Indonesia,” BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2025.
[19] ResRef, “Pregnancy-Related Anxiety Questionnaire–Revised 2: A guide for researchers and clinicians,” 2025.
[20] Y. B. Çelenk et al., “Pregnancy-related anxiety and associated factors among pregnant women in primary care,” Fam. Pract. Palliat. Care, 2024.
[21] “Identification of labor pain in mothers in the active phase of labor,” J. Kebidanan Malahayati, 2025.
[22] N. Noorlinda et al., “Effectiveness of hypnobirthing for reducing anxiety before childbirth,” J. Community Health Sci., 2025.
[23] D. E. Anuhgera et al., “Effect of progressive muscle relaxation on fear of childbirth in primigravida women,” J. Kesehatan Keluarga, 2025.
[24] N. D. Ekayanti et al., “Association between anxiety and labor pain intensity during the first stage of active labor in primigravidas,” Int. J. Adv. Health Sci. Technol., vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 328–334, 2025.
[25] R. Rodrigues et al., “Cross-sectional designs in perinatal mental health research,” J. Reprod. Maternal Health, 2024.
[26] B. Andresen et al., “Best practices for observational design in labor-related psychological research,” Women & Birth, 2023.
[27] D. Alencar and P. Gomes, “Sampling strategies in clinical obstetric research,” Clin. Nursing Stud., 2022.
[28] K. Kalok et al., “Psychosocial determinants of childbirth fear among Asian women,” Healthcare, vol. 13, 2025.
[29] T. Xie et al., “Psychometric evaluation of the PRAQ-R2 in Chinese pregnant women,” Midwifery, 2022.
[30] W. Kurniawati et al., “Validation of the pregnancy-related anxiety scale for Indonesian women,” BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2025.
[31] A. Grant and H. Wooten, “Pain measurement in obstetrics: reliability of NRS tools,” Int. J. Pain Res., 2023.
[32] Y. Hirano and L. Carter, “Quantitative analysis of anxiety-pain correlations in labor,” Midwifery Sci. Int., 2025.
[33] G. Y. Potts and F. Biagi, “Non-parametric correlation methods in clinical data,” Stat. Med., 2021.
[34] A. Salazar et al., “Ethical governance in childbirth-related research,” Global Bioethics Review, 2024.
[35] N. Erbas et al., “Maternal stress response and hormonal pathways affecting labor,” J. Women’s Health Res., 2025.
[36] B. Cavinato et al., “Anxiety and pain neurocircuitry: implications for obstetric pain,” Pain Med., 2024.
[37] H. Matsumoto et al., “Stress, cortisol levels, and pain perception in laboring women,” Front. Psychol., 2024.
[38] M. Tank et al., “Physiological differences in labor pain between primiparous and multiparous women,” BMC Women’s Health, 2025.
[39] R. Septina and N. Rahmawati, “Therapeutic communication and anxiety of primigravidas facing labor,” J. Kebidanan Malahayati, 2024.
[40] B. Gürsoy and N. Gümüş, “Fear of birth and prenatal variables in pregnant women,” BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2025.
[41] C. Alemu et al., “Fear of childbirth and associated factors among pregnant women in Northwest Ethiopia,” Sci. Rep., 2024.
[42] U. Nazir and U. Amin, “Fear of childbirth among primigravidas,” Indian Med. Gazette, 2024.
[43] J. C. Nascimento et al., “Aromatherapy for acute pain relief: Meta- analysis,” Comp. Ther. Clin. Pract., 2022.
[44] W. Kurniawati et al., “Validation of pregnancy-related anxiety scale for Indonesian women,” BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2025.
[45] I. Hildingsson et al., “Cluster analysis of childbirth anxiety, depression, and childbirth self-efficacy,” J. Obstet. Gynecol. Neonatal Nurs., 2024
Authors
Copyright (c) 2025 Novi Danisia Ekayanti , Nurlailis Saadah , Astuti Setiyani , Budi Joko Santosa

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlikel 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).