A Comparative Analysis of Temperature and Humidity with PID Control System and Fuzzy Logic in Climatic Chamber (PID Control)

Rendy Dwi Sutrisno Putra; Triana Rahmawati; Moch.Prastawa  Assalim T.P

doi:10.35882/ijahst.v2i6.177

Authors

Rendy Dwi Sutrisno Putra Department of Electromedical Engineering, Poltekkes Kemenkes Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0009-0000-8841-5427
Triana Rahmawati Department of Electromedical Engineering, Poltekkes Kemenkes Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1245-0554
Moch.Prastawa Assalim T.P Department of Electromedical Engineering, Poltekkes Kemenkes Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5160-2181

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35882/ijahst.v2i6.177

Keywords:

Climatic Chamber, Temperature, Humidity, PID, Fuzzy, Thermohygrometer

Abstract

A room is said to be feasible if the temperature and humidity of the room are in accordance with existing provisions. Thermohygrometer is a tool used to monitor the condition of the room. The thermoygrometer used must be traceable for its measurement results using certain media. The climatic chamber is a device that provides the desired climate regardless of the external environment. There are several systems that can be used to control temperature and humidity, one of which is the PID (Proportional Integral Differential) control system and Fuzzy Logic. This climatic chamber has been tested at temperature measuring points of 25°C, 30°C, 35°C, and humidity of 50% RH, 60% RH, 70% RH then the measurement results are compared with a calibrated thermohygrometer. The measurement results at 25°C have a response time of 7 minutes 30 seconds and an overshoot of 0.1°C, at a temperature of 30°C it has a response time of 5 minutes 15 seconds and an overshoot of 0.1°C, at a temperature of 35°C it has a response time of 5 minutes 30 seconds. and 0.2°C overshoot. At humidity 50%RH it has a response time of 13 minutes 30 seconds, at humidity 60%RH it has a response time of 12 minutes, at humidity 70%RH it has a response time of 6 minutes. The measurement results show that fuzzy logic control has more advantages than PID control. Fuzzy logic control has a faster response time to setpoint than PID control and fuzzy logic control has smaller overshoot than PID control

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

World Health Organization, WHO compendium of innovative health technologies for low-resource settings, 2011-2014 : assistive devices, eHealth solutions, medical devices, other technologies, technologies for outbreaks.

S. Darehshouri, N. Michelsen, C. Schüth, and S. Schulz, “A low-cost environmental chamber to simulate warm climatic conditions,” Vadose Zone Journal, vol. 19, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.1002/vzj2.20023.

G. D. Pasgianos, K. G. Arvanitis, P. Polycarpou, and N. Sigrimis, “A nonlinear feedback technique for greenhouse environmental control,” in Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, Oct. 2003, vol. 40, no. 1–3, pp. 153–177. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1699(03)00018-8.

M. J. Bernard, S. L. Pitz, C. H. Chang, and K. Szlavecz, “Continuous 13C and 15N Labeling of Tree Litter using a Climate-Controlled Chamber,” Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal, vol. 46, no. 21, pp. 2721–2733, Nov. 2015, doi: 10.1080/00103624.2015.1089273.

J. Dostál and L. Ferkl, “Model predictive control of climatic chamber with on-off actuators,” in IFAC Proceedings Volumes (IFAC-PapersOnline), 2014, vol. 19, pp. 4423–4428. doi: 10.3182/20140824-6-za-1003.01571.

D. Hannusch et al., “A SIMPLE AND INEXPENSIVE CONTROL OF RELATIVE HUMIDITY IN A FLOW-THROUGH ENVIRONMENTAL CHAMBER,” 1995.

A. Uribe, J. C. Monsalve, and M. Osorio, Intelligent Control applied to Controlled Environment Chamber. 2015.

W. Widhiada, I. N. G. Antara, I. N. Budiarsa, and I. M. G. Karohika, “The Robust PID Control System of Temperature Stability and Humidity on Infant Incubator Based on Arduino at Mega 2560,” in IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2019, vol. 248, no. 1. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/248/1/012046.

I. Sharma and M. Singh, “Infant Warmer Design with PID Control for Stability and Equal Temperature Distribution Equipped with Digital Scales for Prevention of Hypothermia in Newborns,” International Journal of Advanced Health Science and Technology, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 7–13, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.35882/ijahst.v1i1.2.

J. Kumar and R. Kapoor, “Comparative Analysis of Room Temperature Controller Using Fuzzy Logic & PID,” 2013. [Online]. Available: http://www.ripublication.com/aeee.htm

R. Högström, J. Salminen, and M. Heinonen, “Calibration of hygrometers at non-static conditions,” Meas Sci Technol, vol. 31, no. 3, 2019, doi: 10.1088/1361-6501/ab56a6.

D. Shi, G. Gao, Z. Gao, and P. Xiao, “Application of expert fuzzy PID method for temperature control of heating furnace,” in Procedia Engineering, 2012, vol. 29, pp. 257–261. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2011.12.703.

J. S. Malpica Gutierrez, I. A. Fernandez Pena, and F. M. I. Santa, “Design, construction and implementation of relative humidity and temperature climatic chamber for metrology laboratory,” in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Dec. 2021, vol. 2135, no. 1. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/2135/1/012003.

M. Tajjudin, H. Ismail, and Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers., Comparison Between Optimally-tuned PID with Self Tuning for Steam Temperature Regulation. IEEE, 2012.

D. Shi, G. Gao, Z. Gao, and P. Xiao, “Application of expert fuzzy PID method for temperature control of heating furnace,” in Procedia Engineering, 2012, vol. 29, pp. 257–261. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2011.12.703.

A. Jin, H. Wu, H. Zhu, H. Hua, and Y. Hu, “Design of temperature control system for infant radiant warmer based on Kalman filter-fuzzy PID,” in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Nov. 2020, vol. 1684, no. 1. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1684/1/012140.

R. P. Borase, D. K. Maghade, S. Y. Sondkar, and S. N. Pawar, “A review of PID control, tuning methods and applications,” International Journal of Dynamics and Control. Springer, 2020. doi: 10.1007/s40435-020-00665-4.

J. Chen, Q. Lu, J. Bai, X. Xu, Y. Yao, and W. Fang, “A temperature control method for microaccelerometer chips based on genetic algorithm and fuzzy PID control,” Micromachines (Basel), vol. 12, no. 12, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.3390/mi12121511.

K. Grochalski, M. Wieczorowski, B. Jakubek, and P. Pawlus, “Climatic Chamber for the Credibility Evaluation of Profilometric Measurements,” Advances in Science and Technology Research Journal, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 135–140, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.12913/22998624/122298.

J. Dostál and L. Ferkl, “Model predictive control of climatic chamber with on-off actuators,” in IFAC Proceedings Volumes (IFAC-PapersOnline), 2014, vol. 19, pp. 4423–4428. doi: 10.3182/20140824-6-za-1003.01571.

San-Shan Hung; Albert Chin-Yuh Lin; Yung-Han Chen, “Developing the intelligent predetermined control method for a new temperature and humidity chamber: A Case study for rising temperature under constant relative humidity,” 2015 IEEE Advanced Information Technology, Electronic and Automation Control Conference (IAEAC), 2015.

M. Maricela et al., “Implementation of control algorithms in a climatic chamber,” 2016, doi: 10.1109/ICMEAE.2016.19.

M. Elnour and I. M. Tahaa, PID and Fuzzy Logic in Temperature Control System. [publisher not identified], 2013.

B. Paris, J. Eynard, S. Grieu, and M. Polit, “Hybrid PID-fuzzy control scheme for managing energy resources in buildings Hybrid PID-fuzzy control scheme for managing energy resources in buildings Hybrid PID-fuzzy control scheme for managing energy resources in buildings,” Appl Soft Comput, vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 5068–5080, 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2011.05.052ï.

E. Rakesh Kumar, E. H. Dhaliwal, E. Ram Singh, and E. Mandeep Sharma, “Intelligent Fuzzy Hybrid PID Controller for Temperature control in Process Industry.”

K. A. E. Rakesh and . Prof E. H. S. Dhaliwal, “Intelligent Fuzzy Hybrid PID Controller for Temperature control in Process Industry,” vol. no. 201, pp. 201–205, 2011.