An Analysis of Factors Influencing Participation of Men Fertilizer Age Couples to Acceptors of Mop (Male Operating Methods) Contraception
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35882/ijahst.v4i2.44Keywords:
Vasectomy, Contraseption, MOPAbstract
Vasectomy or MOP is a long-term contraceptive intended for men which can be a form of husband participation in contraception and family planning so that family planning is not only the wife's obligation. Until now, there is still a lack of male participation in taking MOP Contraception, as stated in the results of the Family Health Profile survey conducted by the BKKBN in 2019 in the Indonesia Health Profile in 2019 the MOP target is 8.77% and the achievement is very far from the target, which is only 0, 5%. (RI, 2019). This study was conducted to identify Knowledge, Attitudes and Support of Childbearing age Men's Wives in Jati Village, and to determine the effect of Wife's knowledge, attitudes and support on the participation of Childbearing age Men in the use of MOP contraception. The type of research carried out is observational with analytical survey research methods and cross sectional approach with a population of 405 people and a sample of 134 Childbearing age Men. The sampling technique was cluster random sampling. The dependent variable in this study was the participation of Childbearing age Men, while the independent variables were attitudes, knowledge, and wife's support. Bivariate analysis used is Chi Square with 0.05, Multivariate analysis used is Multiple Logistics Regression. Results: Most (72.4%) Childbearing age Men have less knowledge, Almost all (78.4%) Childbearing age men have a negative attitude towards MOP contraception, and Almost all Childbearing age Men (84.3%) do not receive the support of their wives in participating in using MOP contraception. The results of the analysis test showed that there was an influence of knowledge with the participation of male pus in the use of MOP contraception (P value 0.000) , there was an effect of male pus attitude with participation in the use of MOP contraception (P value 0.025) and there was an effect of wife's support with the participation of male pus in the use of MOP contraception. (P value 0.020). The most influential factor is wife's support with an OR value of 21.712. There is an effect of Wife's Knowledge, Attitude and Support with the participation of Childbearing age Men in the use of MOP contraception.
Downloads
References
W. H. Lu et al., “A randomized, controlled, multicenter contraceptive efficacy clinical trial of the intravas device, a nonocclusive surgical male sterilization,” Asian J. Androl., vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 432–436, 2014, doi: 10.4103/1008-682X.122860.
Z. Miranda, M. F. Akbar, A. Info, M. Acceptors, and F. Planning, “PARTICIPATION OF MALE ASSEPTORS IN THE PROGRAM FAMILY PLANNING , KASUI DISTRICT , WAY KANAN REGENCY , LAMPUNG PROVINCE,” vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 1279–1286, 2022.
A. Hapsari and S. Katerine Aftabuddin, “The Estimation of Male Contraceptive Methods’ Development Considering Legal, Ethical, and Religious Aspects,” vol. 7, no. Icssh 2018, pp. 24–28, 2019, doi: 10.2991/icssh-18.2019.6.
T. E. Geltore and Y. Y. Lakew, “Prevalence of male participation in modern contraceptive use among married men in Durame Town Southern Ethiopia: a community based cross sectional study, 2021,” Pan Afr. Med. J., vol. 41, 2022, doi: 10.11604/pamj.2022.41.307.32402.
A. S. Ansari, A. Badar, and N. K. Lohiya, “Safety evaluation through genotoxicity and apoptotic markers following RISUG® induced contraception and its reversal in male rabbits,” Reprod. Toxicol., vol. 81, pp. 84–92, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2018.07.083.
E. Lincoln, R. McKay, and C. Schunmann, “Male and female sterilisation,” Obstet. Gynaecol. Reprod. Med., vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 219–224, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ogrm.2020.03.009.
G. M. C. Pereira and R. L. Azize, “‘O problema é a enorme produção de espermatozoides’: concepções de corpo no campo da contracepção masculina,” Saúde e Soc., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 147–159, 2019, doi: 10.1590/s0104-12902019180797.
S. Elzanaty and G. Dohle, “Advances in male reproductive surgery: Robotic-assisted vasovasostomy,” Curr. Urol., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 113–117, 2013, doi: 10.1159/000343523.
et al., “Employment Status, Family Income, Contraceptive Availability, and their Effects on the Use of Long Term Contraceptives in Sukoharjo, Central Java,” J. Matern. Child Heal., vol. 01, no. 03, pp. 179–187, 2016, doi: 10.26911/thejmch.2016.01.03.05.
A. Corneli et al., “Contraceptive service delivery in Kenya: A qualitative study to identify barriers and preferences among female sex workers and health care providers,” Contraception, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 34–39, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2016.03.004.
R. Kalra, “Perceptual analysis of women on tubectomy and other family planning services: a qualitative study,” Int. J. Reprod. Contraception, Obstet. Gynecol., vol. 4, no. 1, p. 1, 2015, doi: 10.5455/2320-1770.ijrcog20150218.
A. Manuscript, “Community Activities for Wheelchair Users,” vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 361–374, 2017, doi: 10.3109/17483107.2014.989420.A.
M. Alemayehu, T. Belachew, and T. Tilahun, “Factors associated with utilization of long acting and permanent contraceptive methods among married women of reproductive age in Mekelle town, Tigray region, north Ethiopia,” BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, vol. 12, 2012, doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-12-6.
P. Weber, “Discussions in the comments section: Factors influencing participation and interactivity in online newspapers’ reader comments,” New Media Soc., vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 941–957, 2014, doi: 10.1177/1461444813495165.
A. S. Ansari, A. Badar, K. Balasubramanian, and N. K. Lohiya, “Contraception with RISUG® and functional reversal through DMSO and NaHCO3 in male rabbits,” Asian J. Androl., vol. 18, no. December 2015, pp. 389–395, 2016, doi: 10.4103/1008-682X.185000.
L. A. Herrel, M. Goodman, M. Goldstein, and W. Hsiao, “Outcomes of Microsurgical Vasovasostomy for Vasectomy Reversal: A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review,” Urology, vol. 85, no. 4, pp. 819–825, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.12.023.
Z. Chang et al., “Triptonide is a reversible non-hormonal male contraceptive agent in mice and non-human primates,” Nat. Commun., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2021, doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-21517-5.
J. R. Drevet, “Epididymal approaches to male contraception,” Basic Clin. Androl., vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2018, doi: 10.1186/s12610-018-0078-y.
L. D. Lindberg and I. Maddow-Zimet, “Consequences of sex education on teen and young adult sexual behaviors and outcomes,” J. Adolesc. Heal., vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 332–338, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.12.028.
J. E. Anderson, D. J. Jamieson, L. Warner, D. M. Kissin, A. K. Nangia, and M. MacAluso, “Contraceptive sterilization among married adults: National data on who chooses vasectomy and tubal sterilization,” Contraception, vol. 85, no. 6, pp. 552–557, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.10.009.
H. K. Park, S. H. Paick, H. G. Kim, Y. S. Lho, and S. R. Bae, “Induction of Contraception by Intraepididymal Sclerotherapy,” World J. Mens. Health, vol. 32, no. 2, p. 83, 2014, doi: 10.5534/wjmh.2014.32.2.83.
S. Sharma, R. Sharma, and S. Choudhary, “A study of male sterilization with no scalpel vasectomy,” JK Sci., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 67–70, 2014.
“Master Thesis : Gender Equality and Male-Body Based Contraceptive Use : Evidence from the German Family Panel,” 2021.
J. Olszynko-gryn, N. Hopwood, R. Flemming, and L. Kassell, “Technologies of Contraception and Abortion Jesse Olszynko-Gryn Chapter 36 in Nick Hopwood, Rebecca Flemming and Lauren Kassell (eds.),” vol. 1900, no. 2013, pp. 1–19, 2018.
E. Nieschlag, N. Kumar, and R. Sitruk-Ware, “7α-Methyl-19-nortestosterone (MENTR): The Population Council’s contribution to research on male contraception and treatment of hypogonadism,” Contraception, vol. 87, no. 3, pp. 288–295, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.08.036.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Winda Nur Musfiroh Agustin, Ervi Husni, Ani Media Harumi, Erwin L. Rimban, and Joylyn L. Mejilla
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlikel 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
